“The difference between pain and misery?
Pain is what we walk through; misery is what we sit in.”
I hesitate to write about a quote that says, “misery is what we sit in,” because I don’t want to come across as flippant when it comes to misery and sadness. I can write about these two approaches, though, because I have experienced them both – I have walked through pain and I have sat in misery. For me, I see now that I have a choice as to which course I will pursue.
Looking back I can see times that I chose to sit in misery. At first glance, it may seem strange to consider this as a chosen behavior, but I have talked to many others who admit to this choice as well. The thing to keep in mind is that all behavior is purposeful. In other words, we behave for a reason; we behave to satisfy a need. More simply, with a behavior comes a payback.
All behavior is purposeful.
This is where it gets interesting. Why, for instance, would someone choose to be miserable? What is the payback for misery? I can remember being miserable when work felt overwhelming or when my wife wasn’t reading my mind like I needed her to. Instead of taking a step at a time and seeking other’s assistance at work, or instead of talking to my wife about a frustration or perceived unfairness, I would go into a dark tunnel and distance and separate and withdraw. And to a degree, even though I felt miserable, I also felt kind of good. I clutched my misery and nurtured it, like Gollum talking to himself about his Precious. If my wife wasn’t treating me like I wanted, then I wouldn’t treat her like she probably wanted. Fair is fair. I deserve fairness, I defended, even as I shrunk further away from the very thing, the very person whose intimacy I sought.
Glasser alerted me to this kind of thinking in his book Control Theory* (1985). In fact, he listed four reasons for people to choose misery.
1. It keeps angering under control
Rather than expressing our anger outward, and maybe even threatening and hurting other people, we turn it inward. We don’t know how to deal with our anger in the public arena, so we direct it to a private location. (Besides this kind of behavior hurting our relationships, it also can harm our physical bodies, as anger triggers the release of adrenaline and cortisol into our systems. Over time misery can lead to organs and joints being affected.)
2. It gets others to help us
When we show up as miserable or depressed it can serve as a cry for help, which can be especially appealing for men, who often don’t like to just come out and ask for help.
3. It excuses our unwillingness to do something more effective
The more miserable or depressed we become, the more helpless we become, too. We convey that we are not capable of doing much when we are overcome with misery.
4. It helps us regain control
When we feel out of control because of how someone else is treating us or because of the difficulty of a circumstance, choosing to be miserable or to depress can very much increase our sense of control. No one can challenge us when we are helpless.

Any of these behaviors can make sense at the moment. We are desperate for a behavior that will help us feel better and we rummage around in our behavior system for something that will give us even a smidgeon of control. Being miserable doesn’t feel that great, but it feels better than the alternative, whatever we perceive the alternative to be. Somehow, misery is need-satisfying.
Of course, it is not usually a good idea to tell a person who is in the midst of being depressed or miserable that he/she is choosing it. A miserable person can become quite defensive of their misery. But there will come a time, when things are better or when the pressure is off a bit, when he/she will be more open to considering their role in the misery process.
And what a special moment it is when you first realize that misery isn’t something that just happens to you. An awareness begins to dawn in your thinking, an empowering awareness that maybe, just maybe, you can literally choose your state of mind. As you grow in your understanding of choice theory, it’s like you become immunized against misery and even depression. Yes, it can be scary to realize how much power and responsibility you have for your own mental health, but the trade from victim to empowerment is well worth it.
Yeh, heck yeh. For me it was #1, the one about keeping anger under control. I had never understood it in that way. But it made perfect sense to me as I thought about it. It actually inspired me to get a little help . . . with the anger thing, you know. TJ
Mine was a combination of #2 and #3. I really did want others to view me as helpless, and to come to my aid. I see now that it was kind of manipulative, but I didn’t think that at the moment I was being miserable. BD
I think there should be a #5 on the list, since my being miserable had more to do with punishing others, especially my wife. #5 should be about punishment, about getting back at another person. HR
As always Jim, your blog is spot on. Thanks for this😊
Good to hear from you, Nancy. I appreciate and trust your positive response.
Thank you JIm. I have been informed in the past that arthritis pain is caused by “holding onto things – emotionally”. You post makes a lot of sense to me.
I have missed your posts. I hope you are managing your health. I think of you often
I’ve mentioned the book before, as it helped me better understand the effects on our physical bodies when our
psychological states are off. The book is Back In Control, by David Hanscom, MD. It really is quite good. If Glasser was still around I am pretty sure he and David would be friends.
It is good to hear from you. My health continues to hang in there. Good weather is upon us now in Northern California and I am inspired to maybe get back into cycling. Thank you for your kind thoughts.
Jim (Writing to you on the saint’s day in Ireland, their patron saint, the remarkable and extraordinary Saint Patrick who brought a way of thinking to the island without war!), always a fine thing to read your thoughts and to give in to their inspiration so I have to think. With the mention of anger and cortisol, it seems that “misery-ing” could be a very good choice until the cortisol level has subsided and we can think more clearly again; with misery we limit ourselves temporarily so we can expand eventually I suppose. Your piece here expands my thinking about misery,and the comment about punishing a wife is thoughtful: with the misery and perhaps accompanying withdrawal, an empathic wife just might express concern—-which could be what the longing for affiliation needs. I started thinking, then, about the connection between misery and affiliation and I realize that when I have felt miserable, it has been related to some notions in my Quality World about people or ideas with whom I have had resonance in the past and the fear that those essential people or ideas may no longer exist for me. I would be bereft without them. The expansion comes after a reframing of the expectation or a revisiting of the notion that perhaps new pictures/perceptions have to be imagined and realized. That life goes on….if we’re lucky enough.
(And, it is said, if you’re Irish, you’re lucky enough!)
Blessings, S.
Can’t believe it took me this long to reply to your thoughtful comments. I like how you point out that “misery-ing could be a very good choice until the cortisol level has subsided and we can think more clearly again.” I hadn’t thought of it from that specific perspective, but I appreciate this explanation a lot.
I need to learn more about “misery and affiliation,” as I am not well versed in this; still without completely understanding the problem, I like the solution of sometimes “new pictures have to be imagined and realized.”
Wish I could go to a presentation you are giving and learn more from your insight and experience.