
Finland is doing something really, really right with their schools, yet the U.S. education system is either ignoring what Finland is doing, or is incapable of seeing the value in what they are doing. I suggest we Americans take a moment and consider three key points in Finland’s approach.
In “quality of life” global surveys, out of all the countries in the world Finland ranks #1. The PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) survey, which compares 15 year olds from 18 different countries in reading, math, and science, ranks Finnish students at the top as well. Since 2001, they have either been ranked 1st, 2nd, or 3rd. PISA performance for U.S. students has been middling at best.

So what gives in Finland? Here are three keys to keep in mind.
1) Finland is an education superpower because it values equality over excellence.
When Finland recognized in the 1970s that they had to fix their schools they decided to create an education system that worked for all of its citizens, and especially their children. Today there are hardly any private schools in Finland, and those that do exist cannot charge tuition. Their goal was not to focus on choice, but on equity; not on competition, but on cooperation.
2) They view learning as a constructive process.
Finnish schools assign less homework and schedule more creative play. Except for a national matriculation exam at the end of high school, there are no standardized tests. Periodically, some tests are given to sample groups, but these tests simply provide a snapshot of how their education system is doing in specific content areas.
3) There is no word for accountability in Finnish.
No wonder the Finnish approach to education is going completely over the heads of Americans. We are obsessed with accountability, and because of this we are always on the lookout for a strategy to keep track of performance and then apply the right carrot or stick as needed. Pasi Sahlberg, director of the Finnish Ministry of Education’s Center for International Mobility, during an interview at Teachers’ College of Columbia University, when asked about accountability, shrugged as he pointed out that “There’s no word for accountability in Finnish.” He then explained that “Accountability is something that is left when responsibility has been subtracted.”

From a choice theory perspective there is so much here to think about. Equity over choice might alarm some, but think about the implications of this emphasis. Their goal is to have 100% of their schools be the kind of school that any student would want to attend. In America we don’t work to create excellent schools for all students, but then we use the idea of “choice” to wiggle out of this level of responsibility. We stress competition, even as the “playing field” heavily favors those with money. And no word for accountability? How can that be? As I have thought about it I have come to see the external control nature of accountability. Accountability is monitoring performance so that an external reward or punishment can be strategically applied.
I suppose that accountability does not have to be a bad word. Glasser used the word responsibility a lot to begin with, but then retreated from it when he saw how teachers were using it to pressure kids. He didn’t have good feelings about the word motivate either. He thought that it conveyed the idea of one person applying some sort of external stimuli to get another person to behave in a certain way. Maybe accountability is a similar kind of word. Maybe, though, there is a way to use it appropriately; may it can be used in a way that doesn’t attempt to control people. If we do like the concept of accountability we will need to be vigilant. External control can be so tempting.
Apparently, the Finns don’t have the word accountability in their dictionary. I wonder how we can get it out of ours.
============
You can access The Better Plan posts on –
TWITTER
@thebetterplan
============
For U.S. customers, get a signed copy of Champion of Choice for $20 + $6 (shipping). Send your check, along with any special instructions (e.g.- if the book is a gift), as well as your shipping address, and I will get the biography out to you right away.
Please include your email address, just in case I have questions about your order. My address is P. O. Box 933, Angwin, CA 94508
==============
Today’s blog was based on an article in The Atlantic (Dec. 29, 2011) by Anu Partanen titled What Americans Keep Ignoring About Finland’s School Success. There have been many other articles touting Finland’s school system since then.
Naturally, I appreciate this post. If you’re interested in a unique perspective on the Finnish ed. issue, you should read Taught by Finland, a blog by an American teacher currently teaching in Finland.
Thank you for this heads up.
WOW! Are you connected to the great CT/RT couple in Finland? They will host the next European Glasser Conference 2017, probably in Helsinki. You are the leader that Bill said would emerge.
Beverly A. LaFond, Ph.D., CT/RTC afv2granniandgramps@yahoo.com WGI-US Sunbelt Region Director http://www.glassersunbelt.com 210-677-8235
Great information to share, thanks Jim! While I appreciate the success Finland has in its educational system and want to know what they do so we can borrow ways to get it right, I believe that it is important not to overlook their relatively homogenous society. Furthermore, our political powers at present haven’t yet come to terms with providing good and equal health care for its people. Hungry and unhealthy kids just don’t do well in school! If we are lucky in our life time we will get to see the Republicans and Democrats agree to equality over excellence, view learning as a constructive process and eliminate the barriers caused by accountability. Like others, I appreciate this post.
Good comments, Nadine.
The article did mention the homogeneity factor, acknowledging that as of 2010, 4.6% of Finnish residents had been born in another country, compared with 12.7% in the U.S. The 12% number surprised me a little bit as I thought it would have been higher.
I fully agree with you on how lucky we would be if Congress could work together to prevent and solve problems. That would be amazing!
I miss my visits to NYC and being able to see you and Scott in the process. I hope all is well with you.
I agree with the Fins regarding the word “accountability,” but perhaps for different reasons. People who are extremely consciencious and dedicated are insulted by those who force, leverage, coerce, pressure ……… performance, behavior, production…… Those who are obsessed with accountability don’t trust that others will “fulfill,” so they create a “contract” that enforces, threatens, or punishes. In my world if one “believes in the best of another,” they are more likely to receive the best. I believe in the law, “that they will be what I see.”
That’s a powerful phrase, “They will be what I see.”
Your comments enlarge our view of the idea of accountability.
Hi Jim I just discovered your page and am enjoying your interesting and thought provoking ideas. I would love to present the information you have provided on education in Finland to Australian educators and political figures who are totally driven by accountability, particularly in the state of Queensland. It is very sad to watch young children loose interest in learning due to the pressure on data collection and assessment. I work across both primary and secondary schools and see this in all environments. I was excited today to see the blog from a Principal on the Sunshine Coast who appears to be following Quality School concepts despite external pressure and I’m sure her results are as good as if not better than similar schools who feel they are forced to follow the external directives and expectations. Good on her for following her instincts and understanding of human nature through her knowledge of Choice Theory. Thank you for the work you are doing and I will stay tuned. I did meet you at Toronto and I would love to see you in Queensland Australia for our 2015 conference. If not Korea is looking good.
Kind regards
Denise Landers
Conference Coordinator
Sunshine Coast Queensland Australia 2015
Good to hear from you, Denise.
Have you signed up to Follow the blog? If not, I hope you will take a moment and do that. It’s simple. Just enter your email address and click on the Follow link.
I encourage you to locate the article I quoted from in the blog. There have been many others recently on Finland. I will try to send a few things your way. It sounds like we view things similarly. It also sounds like Queensland has a bit in common with the US when it comes to an accountability obsession. When will we learn?
I would absolutely love to attend your 2015 conference! I have never visited Australia, even though it has been in my Quality World since I was a young man. Over the years I have met a number of wonderful people from Australia who are a part of the choice theory family, but always at a Glasser conference here in the US. At some point I would like to meet them on their home turf.
Scott and I just came back from 2 weeks in Australia, during July. We highly recommend it and its lovely peoples. He was presenting Chair Work Therapy training in 5 cities, and I went along for the ride. Nadine
The word “jealous” comes to my mind. Very cool. Also, I am interested in Scott’s Chair Work Therapy. I follow him on Facebook, but that’s not the same thing as really learning about the craft. I have been meaning to get you guys a copy of the Champion of Choice book I just got published. Scott and I talked about Glasser while I was still working on the manuscript, so he may have an interest in the final product. I think there may even be some correlations between Chair Work Therapy and Choice Theory.
An interesting thought…I’d never considered the negative implications of ‘accountability’ and instead always had perceived Glasserian ideas to be immersed in notions of personal accountability.
Perhaps I’ll have to reconsider..